Three questions about creativity for those ‘in and outside the tent’
My long-term creativity collaborator Susan Moger came up with three questions worth considering on behalf of those inside the tent (educationalists, practitioners, researchers, and so on) and those who might be attracted into the tent (educationalists, practitioners, researchers, and so on).
Here are Susan’s questions
What is creativity anyway?
Why should I care about it?
Why should I spend my time on it?
The tent metaphor is from a crude expression by President Lyndon Johnson. [I don’t want to mis-attribute the quote]. Incidentally, LBJ also was reported as saying
“If one morning I walked on top of the water across the Potomac River, the headline that afternoon would read: ‘President Can’t Swim.’”
What is creativity?
Returning to the three questions, I have been consistent in my view that each individual has to take a view on the first question, but may be informed by the conclusions reached by many who had studied creativity extensively. The consensus is that there is no clear consensus!
That is not quite as bad as it sounds, and is consistent with the view that truth is always viewed through the lens of personal beliefs. Plato said it with another metaphor about seeking reality by having to interpret shadows on the wall of the cave.
I explained in a lengthy video a few years ago, how you may still hold on to some constant core of belief, even if the precise way you define those beliefs may change with time and experience. If you had the luxury of an hour to space with a good supply of refreshments, you may find it interesting. I recall mostly it was painful, as I sustained an attack of cramp due to being perched on chair too high for me to reach the floor.
Why should I care about it?
Because if you care about anything, you become more alert to possibilities. Creativity, even before we agree about formal definitions, is ‘something about’ how we discover new and useful things – about ourselves and our world. The useful things include life-skills, what we do, and how we might do them better.
There is a case which can be made for creativity being spontaneous. Some ‘Creatives’ [ugh!] worry they may lose their creativity if they (or others) examine it too carefully. I prefer to believe that study helps move from implicit to explicit knowledge. This helps us discover more about how we are creative and how we sometimes fail to create through barriers which are often self-imposed
Why should I spend my time on it?
Partly my answer to question two applies. A further argument is contained in the ironic comment made by Gary Player the golfer, to the effect that the harder he practiced, the luckier he got.
Maybe there is something in the old saying that practice makes perfect. I prefer the point that the wrong sort of practice makes permanent. It takes a special kind of practice (creative practice, maybe?) that leads towards improvement.
From a creativity session in Brazil, ca 2010
I recently tried to come up with the name for an evil villain in a piece of fiction I was writing
After a few days without satisfactory results, I found myself falling back on a simple method of brain-dumping, brain-busting, or to use a more recent term a bit of mental deep-diving.
Here are my unedited free-associations.
To find a name for someone described as a shrunken desiccated husk of a man, from whom all joy and juices have drained away. He is clearly of the lizard family. he has the unblinking eyes and bloodless lips of the undead. There is a sinister, frightening, inhuman power about him.
When no name came to mind
I have long advocated the principle of freewheeling, trying to capture fleeting thoughts on paper (or, in this case on my aging iPad. The justification is that some kind of jolt is required. Various techniques are well-known and catalogued over many years. What follows is not offered as evidence for the success of what I did, but as an illustration of the word-salads produced
The Word Salad
Shrek, Desmond Dry, Redmond Drivel, Blister, Tylor, Sinfield, Zac
The Pustular Gaston Groap
Plunge Biggedrake, Peter Plugge,
Pustule Puckle Puce Puldge Pulge Glute
Gaston Glute Pleute
Gaston de Pleute
Milton William Polder, Milt Polder
Oliver Puce (aka Pustule Puke).
How to choose? It is easier if you have a list of barriers or criteria for reaching a short-list of ideas. The might include Novelty, Appropriateness, Absence of obscene implications.
What happened next
I successfully escaped my temporary brain-freeze. I will reveal what happened next, in a future posting.
Before that, I invite students of all ages to suggest how they might have joined in the brain-bashing, if they had been invited to do so.
Alternative suggestions are welcome, and will be acknowledged in the appropriate place (particularly if they assist me directly or indirectly in my immediate need for a name for my fictional villain).
My recent note on dreaming up and selecting names, written at the time of the Boaty Mc Boatface news story
A football match between Barcelona and Paris Saint Germain has become hailed as one of the great fight-backs in sporting history. I examine it as a magical experience in which the impossible was transmuted into the inevitable
The match was a knockout played over two legs, in the prestigious European Champion’s Competition. Barcelona went to Paris for the first leg two weeks ago, as favourites to win, and one of the favourites to win the entire tournament. The first leg was sensational, as PSG produced an exceptional performance, sweeping aside a sluggish Barcelona 4-0. As football fans know, away goals in this competition have extra value. Any draw of 4-4 or fewer goals will mean PSG wins the tie. Pundits write off Barcelona’s chances after the first leg. Statistics show a very low chance of Barca scoring five without a PSG response, or six if PSG were to score a single goal.
The Impossible dream?
The match is reported on news feeds, and on the BT Sport channel in the UK.
Stevie Gerard on BT Sport at the start of the return leg see he was hoping for a miracle and for Barca to win. [I wonder how that slipped through at rehearsal.]
Barcelona began with their world-class attackers in better form. A goal after three minutes brought that faint hope if pressure could be converted into quick goals. Then a reprieve for the Spanish team, as PSG are denied what was consider by the pundits as a clear penalty. Then after 20 minutes, an own goal makes in 2-0 on the night, and faint hope is fanned into stronger life.
Another penalty shortly after half time and Messi makes it 3-0. Now faint hope is turning into belief. Barcelona are creating chances and seem more likely to score.
A foul and a high ball converted by PSG’s main striker Cavani. 3-1 but now the dream is fading, as the requirement is up to three more goals from Barcelona, and time is running up.
Three minutes to full time
A brilliant goal from a free kick for Barcelona, but only three minutes left before full-time. 4-1, which is 4-5 on aggregate. At 5-5, PSG would still win through the away goal. The away goal is working for them. The atmosphere has been cranking up, and hope has been replaced by belief. PSG remain under pressure, as if awaiting the inevitable.
Only a few minutes of added time remains, when the slightest of contact produces a spectacular tumble by Luis Suaraz, a great player and useful gymnast in the fall-down category. 5-5
So near and yet so far?
Five minutes of extra time. Ridiculous tension. Thrills all in the PSG half, but the five minutes creep on. Will the impossible dream remain impossible?
Of course not
In the last moments, yet another free kick. As if by some spell, the defenders cannot move to prevent an attacker re-materializing and striking the ball home. They are spellbound. Barcelona ahead, and the final whistle goes, hardy heard above the thunderous wave of noise engulfing the stadium
Yes, I see it just so. What happened may have had a reality in a mundane world. I hold on to a wondrous story described in magical terms by observer, going viral at the time.
The rapid reaction around the sporting world suggests the game is acquiring mythic status. It is a magical story that will be remembered and re-invented in the retelling. It is the old fireside tale of how the impossible turns into the inevitable.
I am pleased to provide this information sent to me by Professor Kamel Mnisri, a long-time contributor and subscriber to Leaders We Deserve
As a participant in the first conference, I can recommend the mix of backgrounds of participants, the richness of contributions, and the excellent ‘fringe events’ due to the location of the conference [T.R., Editor LWD].
Please pass this information on to your own contacts.
ABOUT THE ARTEM OCC CONFERENCE:
With reference to the great success of the first Artem OCC in Nancy in 2015 we would like to announce the second edition of the Artem international conference on Organizational Creativity and Sustainability which will be held in Nancy, France, from 14 to 16th September 2017.
We intend to pursue the discussions initiated during the last edition, as well as exploring new paths. As such, our objective is to bring together scholars and professionals in areas such as engineering, arts and management to further examine and develop the topic of creativity and sustainability in its different dimensions.
Our intention is to approach the topic of creativity and sustainability from different disciplinary and thematic perspectives in theory and practice. We welcome disruptive approaches that challenge the mainstream perspective on organizational and social arrangements and the manner these can solve environmental, social, and economic problems.
THE ARTEM OCC 2017 CONFERENCE CHAIRS:
Conference co-chairs: Nuno GUIMARAES DA COSTA, Stefan HUESIG, Kamel MNISRI, Klaus-Peter SCHULZ and Paul SHRIVASTAVA.
Theme: “Facilitating sustainable development through a variety of creative approaches”.
Call for papers: click here to download it.
ORGANIZED BY THE ALLIANCE ARTEM RESEARCH:
Artem is an unprecedented transdisciplinary alliance between the Ecole nationale supérieure d’art et de design de Nancy, ICN Business School and Mines Nancy.
Yesterday I was in a fine local bookshop, watching a grandfatherly figure being helped to choose a book for a six- year-old. It was for the upcoming World Book Day
It is an admirable idea for children to be encouraged to love books. This week is, I learn, children’s book week, within which there is World Book Day, at or around the birthday of Hans Christian Andersen
The creative floodgates
Give the advertising tootie-fruities an assignment to publicize the day, and the creativity floodgates open, to the betterment of a generation of children. It offers the promise of a culturally-enriched future. It also works to the betterment of the book trade. Then again, the beneficiaries are vendors of expensive Book Day kiddie’s outfits.
Cue for school gate displays of wealth and who loves you most strutting by parents.
Do something booky
Do something booky, urged one ad, it seems that involves offering the purchase of expensive garments of the fancy dress variety.
Such marketing hype worked for Mothering Sunday, Father’s Day, Halloween, ( Father’s day in November), and Sesquicentennial Day. OK, I made that last one one up, but who knows for the future?
Children’s Book Day is heading for major league status. My guess is that the fancy dresses will outsell books soon, by a midsummer night dream of a figure.