In Part One I looked at the developing stories from June 23rd 2016, the date of the European Referendum in the UK. To deal with the next part of the story, I have to go back to February, to the start of the months of national campaigning.
As a one-time practitioner of brainstorming approaches, I found myself recently putting the rather old-fashioned technique to use. I needed a strap-line (marketing slogan) for a new web-page. I report on the results as a case example for entrepreneurs, project leaders and creative designers.
For the last four weeks [Tuesday June 21- July 19] the political news in the UK has been changing so quickly that drafts of an unpublished post became outdated at least four times. Publication was then hindered for technical reasons. I have attempted to make some retrspective sense out of my unposted notes
A disturbing loss of connectivity has halted the customary weekly supply of posts from Leaders We Deserve.
This is particularly annoying, as the political news in the UK over the last two weeks has been sensational.
I can only plea that Normal Service is now being renewed, and that incompleted materials will eventually be published.
Thanks to the Word Press help system, whose ‘happiness engineers‘ proved courteous and competent, even as my own urgings became less coherent.
Some years ago I carried out a careful review of Tony Blair’s autobiography A Journey:
I am beginning to see how TB presents himself as having unshakeable self-belief. It’s through a process which psychologists call cognitive dissonance. One colleague of mine would say he might have ‘a touch of the coggers’.
Human beings generally can deny the existence of unpleasant evidence which challenges self-esteem. Their reflective processes are curtailed, and this state of denial is a psychic protection mechanism. The example which suggested this possibility is the account [p 88 on] of TB’s decision to send his children the a ‘good’ school rather than a neighbourhood school. These sorts of decisions are seen as presenting dilemmas for socialists in the public eye. During his account of this, Tony Blair suggests that opposition to these views by traditional labour supporters as coming from beliefs (which, he adds in parentheses, might be called prejudices).
The book seeks to present the subject in the light he wishes to be seen in. Don’t we all? Here felt his remorseless insistence being seen as someone in complete control to be of paramount importance.
Writing on the Anniversary of the World Trade Fair bombing, I wondered whether he had the same feelings of dislocation and disorientation that were widely shared by others:
To a degree [chapter 12], but his account is clumsily written for someone with his instinct for the impact of his words. He does briefly convey his emotions, but in preamble, he sets the context with his visit at the time to a highly forgettable visit to a Trades Union Conference which is described with misplaced assumption that readers share the author’s enthusiasm for what Tony did next. [‘The great thing about Brighton is that it is warm…’, followed by a brief paragraph in which I counted 11 uses of the first person singular pronoun.]
How did he feel on first learning of the attack? ‘I felt eerily calm despite being naturally horrified…Within a short space of time I ordered my thoughts ….it was for a battle for and about ideas ….it came with total clarity, and stays still.. as clear now as it was then.’
The chapter quickly turned into a justification for war in Afghanistan as a moral and strategic imperative. His speeches at the time convey what now seems to be an unshakeable belief in the rightness of his judgement. Later in the review I commented more on Tony Blair’s attitude to reality:
After a close reading of the book, I concluded that Tony Blair does not believe that he is a liar in the way many believe to be the case. He has a intuitive way of reaching conclusions, and finds it easy to back-rationalise from them. In this respect he is in denial over contrary beliefs. Having decided that Bill Clinton is a particularly ‘good guy’, he justifies the Monica Lewinski affair in a remarkable bit of special pleading which amounts to his observation that Bill was deeply interested in and curious about people. That might be compared with Clinton’s own piece of denial to the effect that he “never had sex with that woman”.
One explanation is that Blair and Clinton have beliefs that are filtered through a special way of seeing the world which some would say is misguided at times. Some would detect evidence of narcissism, and which in Blair’s case verges on megalomania.
Bertrand Russell observed that megalomania is found in lunatics and among many of those who achieve greatness. Alexander the great is often cited in this respect. There may be actual achievements but the mental condition becomes delusional.
My conclusions after reading the book carefully were as follows:
 Tony Blair believes himself one of the leaders of the world’s progressives
 He “gets it” on big issues: World Peace, The Broken Society, The Economy, The Future of the Labour Party, Leadership, Islamic fundamentalism
 He is deluded in his view that his training as a barrister has gifted him a keen analytical way of analysing of complex events. His arguments often are loosely constructed to arrive at the conclusion he wants to advocate
 The boundless self-confidence conceals deeper insecurities and a need to be loved and seen as someone very special in the eyes of the world
 The book suggests that Tony Blair’s Messianic beliefs have not entirely gone away.
Meanwhile, as the book was published, the inquiry launched by the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown and headed by Sir John Chilcot, was into the second year of its deliberations. It was to be a further six years before it reached the public.
Patricia Cornwell has rightly earned her reputation for her crime-novels, and in particular the series starring her forensic heroine Kay Scarpetta
Her stories are procedural but with flashes of creative insight. I found one such observation in a recently published (2015) novel, Depraved Heart.
A Special Ops team arrives to support forensic scientist Kay Scarpetta and her loveably crude sidekick, detective Pete Marino. The author muses on what makes these action men (and women) so special? Here’s how Cornwall sees it:
When they shift their weight or move they are subtle and silent. They’re agile and non reactive. They’re disciplined, stoical, what I consider the perfect hero blend of selflessness and narcissism. You have to love yourself if you’re going to fight gloriously and bravely..
Selflessness and narcissism
Cornwell is commenting on the heroic person, and what sets them apart.
The only named member of this group of special people in the book is Ajax. After a little checking, I remembered that Ajax figured in Greek mythology as a heroic figure. (So did Hero, another point worth remembering). Let’s just say Cornwell knew what she was doing. Ajax was a warrior with magical powers. Homer’s Ilead leaves Ajax alive, but in the nature of Greek tragic drama, Ajax eventually over-reaches himself, carries out an unworthy act of violence, and commits suicide at the disgrace it brings on his name.
When Cornwell nods
I found Depraved Heart rather plodding, one of the weakest of the Kay Scarpetta novels. My view is shared by other reviewers, but even when Cornwell nods, she is capable of flashes of insight. She concludes the episode involving super-agent Ajax and team with an oxymoronic comment on the nature of heroism, which might apply to notions of the great leader.
It’s a contradiction. It seems illogical. It’s not a stereotype or a cliche when I say that special ops aren’t like the rest of us.
Beware of stereotypes, she is telling us, they are too one-dimensional.