Boycott backs Pietersen

154px-kevin_pietersen.jpg

Update [June 2008]

Geoffrey Boycott backed Kevin Pietersen to replace Michael Vaughan as one-day Captain of England. His prediction was wrong. But one captain later, Kevin Pietersen was appointed to the job.

Original post:

Geoffrey Boycott backs Kevin Pietersen to replace Michael Vaughan as next captain of England’s one day cricket team. Most commentators are backing the steadier Paul Collingwood. Boycott was a brilliant opening bat, and now is a trenchant and insightful commentator. He was also arguably the worse cricket captain of England in modern times. What can we make of his judgement in this case?

According to Jung

One stream of leadership research has drawn on the idea of the shadow self. It’s one of those interesting concepts which can be traced to Carl Gustav Jung.

Rebeca Eigen summarises a complex concept nicely:

Projection is an unconscious psychological mechanism. We all project onto other people parts of ourselves that we disown, that we deny. We will usually not identify with the projected quality or characteristic at all. It’s them. It’s not us … Jung believed that whatever we are highly identified with in our character, the opposite extreme will be in our unconscious. He called this the law of opposites. So unconsciously we will attract the parts of us that we actually badly need.

Gofffrey’s dominant style

Boycott is known as a batting obsessive, dour, dogged, and with a style perhaps reflecting his dogged personality. So we might expect touches of the shadow side. A general loathing of more elegant and gifted colleagues, but sometimes wistfully emulating them. He has worked at a carefully cultivated and jaunty persona and dress for his numerous TV appearances.

Now he appears to be backing Pietersen, which I suggest is a shadow-self character, as the new one-day cricket captain for England.

Kevin

Kevin Pietersen would undoubtedly play out Geoffrey’s shadow self as a cricketer. List some descriptors that would capture Petersen’s style and flamboyant, enthusiastic, bold-minded and big-hitting come to mind.

He has been considered to have one characteristic shared with Boycott. He is not particularly noted as a team player.

Geoffrey’s judgement

Paul Collinwood, A more team-minded player than Boycott or Pietersen, has been widely tipped as the next captain. Ironically, he appears to be a safe pair of hands both literally and metaphorically. Vaughan was safe pair of hands metaphorically but a bit less so in the field of play…

Collingwood rarely throws his wicket away, and it that sense is closer to Boycott than to Pietersen.

Geoffrey’s judgement of the technicalities of batting is nearly matchless. He is also widely regarded as an excellent business-man. Which may be a clue to his advocacy of Pietersen.

It may be that Geoffrey admires Kevin for exhibiting all the suppressed aspects of his own cricketing style.

Or, perish the thought …

Or might there be something more mutually beneficial going on? Kevin’s website at present has the cover of his new book prominently displayed. With a glowing endorsement from, yes, you’ve guessed it, one Geoffrey Boycott.

Sorry Geoff

Boycott’s call for more flair went unnoticed. Collingwood was appointed. According to BBC Sport, David Graveney, chairman of selectors announced that

“The selectors believe that Paul Collingwood’s experience and performances in the one-day game make him the ideal candidate to lead the side”

Collingwood had told BBC Sport before the announcement: “I’ve not had much captaincy experience. I would have to learn very quickly.”

But the 31-year-old insisted the split captaincy – Vaughan will continue to lead the Test side – will work for England under the guidance of coach Peter Moores.

About these ads

5 Responses to Boycott backs Pietersen

  1. i believe flintoff should be given captaincy back

  2. Tudor says:

    I’m a bit light on personal knowledge of English Cricket Captains. I did get to know Mike Brearley a little after he had finished his illustrious stint as Captain. From afar, Vaughan seems to have something of the Brearley style, Flintoff and Pietersen a bit more of the Botham cricketing style.

    I’m not sure that general personality translates as nicely as it might to captaincy, and I can’t see what selectors might see in KP that they can’t see in FF.

    Which seems to suggest that if Freddie is now out of favor, it’s partly a matter of so-called ‘non-cricketing considerations’ …

  3. [...] time of Geoffrey’s recommendation, a Leaders we deserve post was unkind about Boycott’s choice. Boycott’s judgment, and even his motivation for backing Pietersen were disparaged. Boycott was a brilliant opening [...]

  4. [...] But Pietersen retains his advocates. His ability to dominate a bowling attack is taken as a prime consideration for leading from the front. In an earlier post we explored why Geoffrey Boycott, a hapless captain himself, has recently argued the case for Pietersen. [...]

  5. Tudor says:

    The sad tale continues [Jan 2009] as Pietersen is sacked after three gamss as captain.

    My concerns about the appointment process seem to have been reasonably well- founded.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,559 other followers

%d bloggers like this: